[关闭]
@NovLego 2019-12-01T08:40:05.000000Z 字数 2799 阅读 291

From Fermat to Euler

Mathematics


Let demotes the set of positive integer ,where is a prime.
Let be a positive integer where .
is the full permutation of


Proof:
Let .
For ,if ,we have .

Because ,so ,.That is,we can always find 's inverse of modulus ,called .

Therefore,,which is .

Because ,so .
In other words,for , has distincted value and the range is ,so is a permutation of .

That is,.
Q.E.D.



Since we have ,when we multiply all the element in ,we are multiplying all the elements in together.

That is,
Since is a prime,have a unique inverse.

So we multiply with both sides,we get .


The map is a bijection


The map is a permutation,so for every image,we can always find its preimage,so the map is a surjection.

We've already proved that every preimage will be mapped to distincted image.So every image have at most one preimage,the map is a injection.

In conclusion,it's a bijection.

The most important property...Maybe ?Without it,we can't find that cancel .


when


From Bezout Theorem we've known that , is the smallest non-negative integer in ,and is multiple of .

Hence,if is not a coprime of , can not be a permutation of .The map is neither surjection nor injection.



If denotes all the coprime of in ,then we got ,where is also a coprime of .
It's worth noting that every element in have its inverse modulus .

Let =
Then we multiply all the elements together like before,we get .

Since every element in have its inverse modulus ,we can multiply their inverse with both sides respectively.

Finally we get .


More about Euler's Phi Function


1.when is a prime, .

2.when is a prime,for , is a factor of .
.

3.when is a composite and ,where and are distinct primes.
For ,.Similarly,for ,.

(plus one because I subtract for two times.)


4.Further on,if ,where are distinct primes,it seems like .

5.If ,where are distinct primes,it seems like

添加新批注
在作者公开此批注前,只有你和作者可见。
回复批注